This entry is based on Brown, H. D. (2000).
Principles of language learning and teaching. (4ed). Chapter 3: Designing
Classroom Language Tests. pp 42-65. New York: Pearson ESL.
In previous entries I have talked about
alternatives in assessment and the importance of using activities different
from a test to measure students’ performance. However, it does not mean that we
should avoid using tests in our classroom assessment; the alternatives in
assessment are necessary to triangulate results and obtain a more reliable measurement.
By reading this chapter I noticed some wrong
things I have been doing while evaluating my students. For instance, my purpose
when applying a test was just to assign a grade because I need to present reports
for parents and coordinators of the institute. The objective was, of course, to
enhance students’ learning but I forgot one of the most important tools of
learning: feedback. I focused more on pointing out where the mistake was and I
did not tell the student how to improve their proficiency from those mistakes.
Regarding the task chosen for the tests, I
did not analyse the appropriateness of every single item; sometimes I realised
that an item were not chosen correctly after the exam. Actually, the majority
of the tasks I have used in my class are those that my professors used when I
was learning English in the first semesters of my career –and I think most of
my partners do the same–. Now, a question comes to my mind ¿Where those tasks
and tests chosen appropriately for us?
I particularly remember in first semester that
there were like four different courses and a different professor for each one.
One professor was in charge of making a part of the test (writing, reading,
grammar, and listening. Speaking was made by the professor of each group)
taking into account that all the groups were following the same book. Nevertheless,
professors teach in different ways and in one exam, the professor in charge of
the writing part made a task different from the ones we did with our professor
during the classes. The result was that students who took the course with the
professor that made the writing part outperformed the other students. I want
you to give me your opinions about the following questions that come to my mind:
¿The tests we had to take in the first
semesters were appropriately chosen for us? Why? If not, ¿should we use the
same kind of test task that our professors used with us? ¿how can a university
train future professor by giving them bad examples of how to assess students?